|
To publish such of those novel studies backed by scientific
data where human healing outcomes have been
significant, irrespective of the system of medical care
used.
|
|
|
To use a "super peer review" system that improves upon
the conventional "peer review" system that has been
declared insufficient even by the courts in the US, apart
from their futility in going deep into the house keeping
details of the studies concerned.
|
|
|
The "super peer review" system uses a peerless expert track
record and a secondary use of Specialists in the particular
field of study under consideration to review the
manuscript.
|
|
|
The author(s) of any study for publication should have had
a good reputation in the scientific community in hisher
area of expertise by having published several research
papers in indexed journals in the past.
|
|
|
To allow even young scientists of promise to have their work
published as long as they have a qualified scientist as their
sponsor who vouches for the authenticity of the study.
|
|
|
To have an Editorial Board that is sufficiently broad based to
include specialists, not only in the various medical care
delivery arena but also those leaders in the hard sciences and
humanities, to be able to guide the destinies of the journal
and to provide the super peer review support.
|
|
|
To make the journal more readable for the interested public
with relevant poems and annotations to highlight really
novel progress made in the world of human wellness and
illnesses.
|
|
| To occasionally publish outstanding in vitro studies that give
credence to human healing outcomes. |
|
|
To evolve as we go based on the feedback we get from our
users and friends.
|